Re: [patch 2/4] mm, oom: cleanup pagefault oom handler

From: David Rientjes
Date: Thu Nov 15 2012 - 16:01:15 EST


On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:

> > @@ -708,15 +671,17 @@ out:
> >
> > /*
> > * The pagefault handler calls here because it is out of memory, so kill a
> > - * memory-hogging task. If a populated zone has ZONE_OOM_LOCKED set, a
> > parallel
> > - * oom killing is already in progress so do nothing. If a task is found
> > with
> > - * TIF_MEMDIE set, it has been killed so do nothing and allow it to exit.
> > + * memory-hogging task. If any populated zone has ZONE_OOM_LOCKED set, a
> > + * parallel oom killing is already in progress so do nothing.
> > */
> > void pagefault_out_of_memory(void)
> > {
> > - if (try_set_system_oom()) {
> > + struct zonelist *zonelist = node_zonelist(first_online_node,
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
>
>
> why GFP_KERNEL ? not GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE ?
>

The usual way to get a zonelist consisting of all zones ordered by
preferring a node is node_zonelist(nid, GFP_KERNEL), but there's no
difference between using GFP_KERNEL, GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, or even 0. I
simply duplicated what the sysrq trigger was doing, but you could also do
&first_online_pgdat->node_zonelists[0], it's really just a matter of
preference.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/