Re: [PATCH] ipack: move header files to include/linux

[Joe Perches]

On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 19:14 +0100, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 10:08 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 18:34 +0100, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote:
> > > Move ipack header files to include/linux/ directory where they belong to.
> > 
> > Why do these belong in include/linux?
> 
> They are used for other drivers that could be in other directories.

But are not currently.

> > What's wrong with path relative includes?
> 
> There is nothing wrong with relative includes. It's just to do the
> things as other subsystems do: keeping the bus' header file in
> include/linux directory.
> 
> Is this approach wrong for this case?

There's enough clutter in include/linux, so until these
includes are used by other directory drivers, I think so,
yes.  

cheers, Joe



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/