Re: Benchmark results: "Enhanced NUMA scheduling with adaptiveaffinity"

[Mel Gorman]

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 08:50:18PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:14:28PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > With some shuffling the question on what to consider for merging
> > becomes
> > 
> >
> > 1. TLB optimisation patches 1-3?	 	Patches  1-3
> 
> I assume you mean simply reshuffling 33-35 as 1-3.
> 

Yes.

> > 2. Stats for migration?				Patches  4-6
> > 3. Common NUMA infrastructure?			Patches  7-21
> > 4. Basic fault-driven policy, stats, ratelimits	Patches 22-35
> > 
> > Patches 36-43 are complete cabbage and should not be considered at this
> > stage. It should be possible to build the placement policies and the
> > scheduling decisions from schednuma, autonuma, some combination of the
> > above or something completely different on top of patches 1-35.
> > 
> > Peter, Ingo, Andrea?
> 
> The patches 1-35 looks a great foundation so I think they'd be an
> ideal candidate for a first upstream inclusion.
> 

Thanks.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/