RE: [PATCH] serial: ifx6x60: ifx_spi_write don't need to domrdy_assert when fifo is not empty.

[Chen, Jun D]

Hi,
   I make this patch on your tty-next tree,  Do I need to make it on the branch 3.7-rc6 against?

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 8:39 PM
To: Chen, Jun D
Cc: Alan Cox; Bi, Chao; serial; Gorby, Russ; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Wu, Fengguang
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: ifx6x60: ifx_spi_write don't need to do mrdy_assert when fifo is not empty.

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 06:08:37AM -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
> 
> This patch check whether the fifo lenth is empty before writing new 
> data to fifo.If condition is true,ifx_spi_write need to trigger one 
> mrdy_assert. If condition is false,the mrdy_assert will be trigger by the next ifx_spi_io.
> 
> Cc: Bi Chao <chao.bi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Jun <jun.d.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/ifx6x60.c |   14 +++++++++++---
>  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

What tree did you make this against?  It doesn't apply to my tty-next tree at all :(

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/