Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] mfd: add viperboard driver

[Lars Poeschel]

On Tuesday 20 November 2012 at 09:34:56, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> I'll try to have a look this week. It fell a bit off because linux-i2c
> was not in CC. I do wonder about the naming, though. VIPERBOARD is
> probably the board name, but not the IP core/SoC name?

I am sorry, that I forgot the CC.
You are right it is the board name but not a IP/SoC name. It seems this 
device is weird to kernel developers - you are not the first one asking. You 
don't have to see the term board as in kernel sense where it describes a 
specific SoC and the components connected to it. It is a circuit board, that 
connects to usb on one side and GPIO, I²C and so on on the other side. You 
can have a look at it here:
http://nanorivertech.com/viperboard-specs.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/