Re: [PATCH 04/11] pidns: Use task_active_pid_ns where appropriate

[Gao feng]

on 2012/11/17 00:35, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The expressions tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns and task_active_pid_ns
> aka ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) should have the same number of
> cache line misses with the practical difference that
> ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) is released later in a processes life.
> 
> Furthermore by using task_active_pid_ns it becomes trivial
> to write an unshare implementation for the the pid namespace.
> 
> So I have used task_active_pid_ns everywhere I can.
> 
> In fork since the pid has not yet been attached to the
> process I use ns_of_pid, to achieve the same effect.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Acked-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/