[ 123/171] libceph: dont use bio_iter as a flag

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Thu Nov 22 2012 - 16:36:32 EST


3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxxx>

(cherry picked from commit abdaa6a849af1d63153682c11f5bbb22dacb1f6b)

Recently a bug was fixed in which the bio_iter field in a ceph
message was not being properly re-initialized when a message got
re-transmitted:
commit 43643528cce60ca184fe8197efa8e8da7c89a037
Author: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@xxxxxxxxx>
rbd: Clear ceph_msg->bio_iter for retransmitted message

We are now only initializing the bio_iter field when we are about to
start to write message data (in prepare_write_message_data()),
rather than every time we are attempting to write any portion of the
message data (in write_partial_msg_pages()). This means we no
longer need to use the msg->bio_iter field as a flag.

So just don't do that any more. Trust prepare_write_message_data()
to ensure msg->bio_iter is properly initialized, every time we are
about to begin writing (or re-writing) a message's bio data.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ceph/messenger.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
+++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ static void prepare_write_message_data(s
else
con->out_msg_pos.page_pos = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
- if (msg->bio && !msg->bio_iter)
+ if (msg->bio)
init_bio_iter(msg->bio, &msg->bio_iter, &msg->bio_seg);
#endif
con->out_msg_pos.data_pos = 0;
@@ -672,10 +672,6 @@ static void prepare_write_message(struct
m->hdr.seq = cpu_to_le64(++con->out_seq);
m->needs_out_seq = false;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
- else
- m->bio_iter = NULL;
-#endif

dout("prepare_write_message %p seq %lld type %d len %d+%d+%d %d pgs\n",
m, con->out_seq, le16_to_cpu(m->hdr.type),


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/