Re: [PATCH 1/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Fix the PWM polarity

From: Alexandre Pereira da Silva
Date: Fri Nov 23 2012 - 04:34:17 EST


On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Alban Bedel
<alban.bedel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The duty cycles value goes from 1 (99% HIGH) to 256 (0% HIGH) but it
> is stored modulo 256 in the register as it is only 8 bits wide.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
> index adb87f0..03ec3ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
> @@ -49,9 +49,24 @@ static int lpc32xx_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> c = 0; /* 0 set division by 256 */
> period_cycles = c;
>
> + /* The duty value is a follow:
> + *
> + * DUTY HIGH LEVEL
> + * 1 99.9%
> + * 25 90.0%
> + * 128 50.0%
> + * 220 10.0%
> + * 255 0.1%
> + * 0 0.0%
> + *
> + * In other word the in-register value is duty % 256 with duty
> + * in the range 1-256.
> + */
> c = 256 * duty_ns;
> do_div(c, period_ns);
> - duty_cycles = c;
> + if (c > 255)
> + c = 255;
> + duty_cycles = 256 - c;
>
> writel(PWM_ENABLE | PWM_RELOADV(period_cycles) | PWM_DUTY(duty_cycles),
> lpc32xx->base + (pwm->hwpwm << 2));
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/