Re: [PATCH 4/4 v8] AMD64 EDAC: Fix type usage in NB IDs and memoryranges

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Fri Nov 30 2012 - 12:17:41 EST


On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 04:44:20PM +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> Use appropriate types for northbridge IDs and memory ranges. Mark immutable
> data const and keep within compilation unit on related structures. Tested on
> multi-socket server and multi-server, multi-socket NumaConnect setup.
>
> v7: Refactor patches grouping changes
> v8: Drop unneeded change; use const and static where appropriate
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h | 2 +-
> drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h
> index 417eb24..d2e703b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static inline bool amd_nb_has_feature(unsigned feature)
> return ((amd_northbridges.flags & feature) == feature);
> }
>
> -static inline struct amd_northbridge *node_to_amd_nb(int node)
> +static inline struct amd_northbridge *node_to_amd_nb(u16 node)

I'm dropping this change from this patch because if we go with it,
we'll have to change all callsites of node_to_amd_nb which would cause
unnecessary churn.

So, I've applied the final patchset and uploaded a branch here:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git numascale

Please give it a run on both configurations and let me know if something
is still amiss.

Thanks.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/