Re: [PATCH 1/6] ux500: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t

From: Linus Walleij
Date: Sat Dec 01 2012 - 13:11:04 EST

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
<mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> spinlock_t should always be used.
> I was unable to build test with allmodconfig:
> mcgrof@frijol ~/linux-next (git::(no branch))$ make C=1 M=drivers/crypto/ux500/
> WARNING: Symbol version dump /home/mcgrof/linux-next/Module.symvers
> is missing; modules will have no dependencies and modversions.
> LD drivers/crypto/ux500/built-in.o
> Building modules, stage 2.
> MODPOST 0 modules
> Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reported-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Looks correct to me.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

Linus Walleij
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at