Re: [PATCH] serial: tegra: add serial driver

[Grant Likely]

On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:58:18 -0700, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/19/2012 07:15 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 06:31 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:31:34 -0700, Stephen
> >> Warren<swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> >>> On 12/17/2012 10:10 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:40:49 +0530, Laxman
> >>>> Dewangan<ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Aren't we still supposed to support platform data so that it can
> >>> override what's in DT in order to fix up bad DTs? Or, has that
> >>> requirement been dropped. If it has, we can drop a bunch of code from a
> >>> variety of Tegra-specific drivers, I expect.
> >> Do you have an actual user for this? If not, then don't borrow trouble.
> >> Just drop it. Things like platform_data can always be added later only
> >> if it is needed.
> > 
> > Currently all our board supports DT. we are not using any driver
> > instantiated by board files.
> > I will remove the platform data for current patch and if it is require
> > then will add later with reasoning.
> > 
> > Hope this will be fine with Stephen also so that  this basic patch can
> > be included into tree soon.
> 
> I'm fine with it; it's just a change in policy that hadn't been
> communicated before.

Not really. For as long as I can remember there has been a strong bias
against unused code in the kernel. That goes for platform_data support
code as much as anything else.

What has been policy is that adding DT support must never break existing
non-DT support as long as non-DT booting is supported by a platform.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/