[PATCH 3/5] fuse: wait for end of IO on release

From: Maxim Patlasov
Date: Thu Dec 20 2012 - 07:31:47 EST


There are two types of I/O activity that can be "in progress" at the time
of fuse_release() execution: asynchronous read-ahead and write-back. The
patch ensures that they are completed before fuse_release_common sends
FUSE_RELEASE to userspace.

So far as fuse_release() waits for end of async I/O, its callbacks
(fuse_readpages_end and fuse_writepage_finish) calling fuse_file_put cannot
be the last holders of fuse file anymore. To emphasize the fact, the patch
replaces fuse_file_put with __fuse_file_put there.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/fuse/file.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index 4f23134..aed9be2 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -137,6 +137,12 @@ static void fuse_file_put(struct fuse_file *ff, bool sync)
}
}

+static void __fuse_file_put(struct fuse_file *ff)
+{
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ff->count))
+ BUG();
+}
+
int fuse_do_open(struct fuse_conn *fc, u64 nodeid, struct file *file,
bool isdir)
{
@@ -260,7 +266,12 @@ void fuse_release_common(struct file *file, int opcode)
* Make the release synchronous if this is a fuseblk mount,
* synchronous RELEASE is allowed (and desirable) in this case
* because the server can be trusted not to screw up.
+ *
+ * We might wait for them (asynchronous READ or WRITE requests), so:
*/
+ if (ff->fc->close_wait)
+ BUG_ON(atomic_read(&ff->count) != 1);
+
fuse_file_put(ff, ff->fc->destroy_req != NULL);
}

@@ -271,6 +282,31 @@ static int fuse_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)

static int fuse_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
+ struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
+
+ if (ff->fc->close_wait) {
+ struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
+
+ /*
+ * Must remove file from write list. Otherwise it is possible
+ * this file will get more writeback from another files
+ * rerouted via write_files.
+ */
+ spin_lock(&ff->fc->lock);
+ list_del_init(&ff->write_entry);
+ spin_unlock(&ff->fc->lock);
+
+ wait_event(fi->page_waitq, atomic_read(&ff->count) == 1);
+
+ /*
+ * Wait for threads just released ff to leave their critical
+ * sections. Taking spinlock is the first thing
+ * fuse_release_common does, so that this is unnecessary, but
+ * it is still good to emphasize right here, that we need this.
+ */
+ spin_unlock_wait(&ff->fc->lock);
+ }
+
fuse_release_common(file, FUSE_RELEASE);

/* return value is ignored by VFS */
@@ -610,8 +646,17 @@ static void fuse_readpages_end(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_req *req)
unlock_page(page);
page_cache_release(page);
}
- if (req->ff)
- fuse_file_put(req->ff, false);
+ if (req->ff) {
+ if (fc->close_wait) {
+ struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(req->inode);
+
+ spin_lock(&fc->lock);
+ __fuse_file_put(req->ff);
+ wake_up(&fi->page_waitq);
+ spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
+ } else
+ fuse_file_put(req->ff, false);
+ }
}

struct fuse_fill_data {
@@ -637,6 +682,7 @@ static void fuse_send_readpages(struct fuse_fill_data *data)
if (fc->async_read) {
req->ff = fuse_file_get(ff);
req->end = fuse_readpages_end;
+ req->inode = data->inode;
fuse_request_send_background(fc, req);
} else {
fuse_request_send(fc, req);
@@ -1178,7 +1224,8 @@ static ssize_t fuse_direct_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
static void fuse_writepage_free(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_req *req)
{
__free_page(req->pages[0]);
- fuse_file_put(req->ff, false);
+ if (!fc->close_wait)
+ fuse_file_put(req->ff, false);
}

static void fuse_writepage_finish(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_req *req)
@@ -1191,6 +1238,8 @@ static void fuse_writepage_finish(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_req *req)
dec_bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK);
dec_zone_page_state(req->pages[0], NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP);
bdi_writeout_inc(bdi);
+ if (fc->close_wait)
+ __fuse_file_put(req->ff);
wake_up(&fi->page_waitq);
}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/