RE: [PATCH 20/25] wimax/i2400m: fix i2400m->wake_tx_skb handling

From: Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
Date: Sat Dec 22 2012 - 10:28:01 EST

Next message: Maciej Rutecki: "[REGRESSION][3.8.-rc1][ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]"
Previous message: Woody Wu: "Re: How kernel handle interrupts[AX88796B network controller]"
In reply to: Tejun Heo: "[PATCH 20/25] wimax/i2400m: fix i2400m->wake_tx_skb handling"
Next in thread: Tejun Heo: "[PATCH 19/25] net/caif: don't use [delayed_]work_pending()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> From: Tejun Heo [mailto:htejun@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tejun Heo
0m: fix i2400m->wake_tx_skb handling
>
...
>
> Only compile tested.

I don't have access to hardware to test this--might want to contact Dan Williams,
as he has been more actively using it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Maciej Rutecki: "[REGRESSION][3.8.-rc1][ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]"
Previous message: Woody Wu: "Re: How kernel handle interrupts[AX88796B network controller]"
In reply to: Tejun Heo: "[PATCH 20/25] wimax/i2400m: fix i2400m->wake_tx_skb handling"
Next in thread: Tejun Heo: "[PATCH 19/25] net/caif: don't use [delayed_]work_pending()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]