Re: [PATCH V2] Fix problem with cpufreq_ondemand or cpufreq_conservative

[Viresh Kumar]

I know, V4 is already accepted, but i had an small comment with one
of your earlier change, which doesn't exist anymore :)

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Index: wireless-testing-new/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c

How are you creating these patches? wireless-testing-new (linux directory names)
aren't supposed to be present here.

> ===================================================================
> --- wireless-testing-new.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> +++ wireless-testing-new/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> @@ -316,3 +316,8 @@ second_time:
>         return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_governor_dbs);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Alexander Clouter <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>");

You shouldn't be adding yourself as author here :)

MODULE_AUTHOR("Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx>");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@xxxxxxxxx>");
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/