Re: [PATCH 23/24] cfq-iosched: collect stats from dead cfqgs
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Wed Jan 02 2013 - 11:52:32 EST
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:44:15AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > In fact if we have a realiable way of resetting status then online/offline
> > > infrastructure might not be required? I think per cpu stats will be a
> > > problem though and that's why we probably require logic to online/offline
> > > the group?
> > Hmmm? What do you mean?
> I mean if we had a reliable way of resetting stats after transferring
> then we would not need to keep a track of whether group is online/offline.
> We could add everything and adding zero will not change anything. In fact
> it will also take care of residual IO (IO which happened after transfer
> of stats).
Ah... yeah, if we can do atomic transfer, we might be able to do away
with on/offlining. Couldn't think of a way to do that without
incurring overhead to hot paths.
> Or I missed the real reason of why do we have group online/offline
But given that on/offline state is something common to cgroup, I don't
think adding the states to blkcg is a bad idea. We need it for
reliable iterations anyways.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/