Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: make return_address available for ARM_UNWIND

From: Russell King - ARM Linux
Date: Thu Jan 03 2013 - 05:43:23 EST

On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 07:12:29PM +0900, kpark3469@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> -#if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) || defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND)
> /*
> * return_address uses walk_stackframe to do it's work. If both
> * CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y and CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND=y walk_stackframe uses unwind
> - * information. For this to work in the function tracer many functions would
> - * have to be marked with __notrace. So for now just depend on

So what have you done about the issue referred in this comment? Or do you
believe that fixing warnings (even if they are explicit #warning statements)
is far more important than code being functionally correct?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at