Re: [PATCH net-next] softirq: reduce latencies
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Jan 03 2013 - 15:46:02 EST
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 04:28:52 -0800
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> In various network workloads, __do_softirq() latencies can be up
> to 20 ms if HZ=1000, and 200 ms if HZ=100.
> This is because we iterate 10 times in the softirq dispatcher,
> and some actions can consume a lot of cycles.
hm, where did that "20 ms" come from? What caused it? Is it simply
the case that you happened to have actions which consume 2ms if HZ=1000
and 20ms if HZ=100?
> This patch changes the fallback to ksoftirqd condition to :
> - A time limit of 2 ms.
> - need_resched() being set on current task
> When one of this condition is met, we wakeup ksoftirqd for further
> softirq processing if we still have pending softirqs.
Do we need both tests? The need_resched() test alone might be
With this change, there is a possibility that a rapidly-rescheduling
task will cause softirq starvation?
Can this change cause worsened latencies in some situations? Say there
are a large number of short-running actions queued. Presently we'll
dispatch ten of them and return. With this change we'll dispatch many
more of them - however many consume 2ms. So worst-case latency
increases from "10 * not-much" to "2 ms".
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/