Re: [PATCH] fb: Rework locking to fix lock ordering on takeover

[Alexander Holler]

Am 05.01.2013 13:07, schrieb Alan Cox:
> > So to add such an "I am crap" flag my idea would be to add an
> > .fb_handle_damage to struct fb_ops and then call that (if exists)
> > whenever something was changed.
>
> I was thinking much higher level - ie at the printk kind of level
>
> > My patch (for udlfb) follows as an reply to this message. If that patch
> > is ok, it should be applied to smscufx too (I would make it). In regard
> > to udl I don't know, I haven't had a deeper look at it nor used it up to
> > now.
>
> Looks pretty clean as a solution to me.

Thanks and sorry for the two empty lines in the patch. I swear I had a 
look at the patch before sending it out, but haven't seen them.

So should I make the same patch for smscufx  and while beeing there, 
send out at v2 without those 2 empty lines?

Regards,

Alexander


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/