Re: [ 104/173] rt2x00: Dont let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDUsubframe fails
From: Jonathan Nieder
Date: Mon Jan 07 2013 - 03:18:14 EST
Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 01:42:37PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> To be clear, I have all of these in the queue:
>> be03d4a45c09 rt2x00: Don't let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fails
>> 5b632fe85ec8 mac80211: introduce IEEE80211_HW_TEARDOWN_AGGR_ON_BAR_FAIL
>> ab9d6e4ffe19 Revert: "rt2x00: Don't let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fails"
>> and I'm intending to drop/defer them all.
> Patch 3 is a revert of patch 1 (questioned patch). Please apply all 3 patches,
> or only patch 2.
Despite its title, isn't patch 3 not exactly a revert? It includes a
change that depends on patch 2. I don't think patch 2 alone would
have any effect.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/