Re: [ 104/173] rt2x00: Dont let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDUsubframe fails
From: Stanislaw Gruszka
Date: Mon Jan 07 2013 - 03:38:07 EST
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:18:21AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 01:42:37PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> To be clear, I have all of these in the queue:
> >> be03d4a45c09 rt2x00: Don't let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fails
> >> 5b632fe85ec8 mac80211: introduce IEEE80211_HW_TEARDOWN_AGGR_ON_BAR_FAIL
> >> ab9d6e4ffe19 Revert: "rt2x00: Don't let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fails"
> >> and I'm intending to drop/defer them all.
> > Patch 3 is a revert of patch 1 (questioned patch). Please apply all 3 patches,
> > or only patch 2.
> Despite its title, isn't patch 3 not exactly a revert? It includes a
> change that depends on patch 2. I don't think patch 2 alone would
> have any effect.
Yes, all 3 patches should go in.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/