Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] virtio: add functions for piecewise addition of buffers
From: Rusty Russell
Date: Mon Jan 07 2013 - 22:04:17 EST
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Il 07/01/2013 01:02, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
>> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> Il 02/01/2013 06:03, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
>>>> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>> The virtqueue_add_buf function has two limitations:
>>>>> 1) it requires the caller to provide all the buffers in a single call;
>>>>> 2) it does not support chained scatterlists: the buffers must be
>>>>> provided as an array of struct scatterlist;
>>>> Chained scatterlists are a horrible interface, but that doesn't mean we
>>>> shouldn't support them if there's a need.
>>>> I think I once even had a patch which passed two chained sgs, rather
>>>> than a combo sg and two length numbers. It's very old, but I've pasted
>>>> it below.
>>>> Duplicating the implementation by having another interface is pretty
>>>> nasty; I think I'd prefer the chained scatterlists, if that's optimal
>>>> for you.
>>> Unfortunately, that cannot work because not all architectures support
>>> chained scatterlists.
>> WHAT? I can't figure out what an arch needs to do to support this?
> It needs to use the iterator functions in its DMA driver.
But we don't care for virtio.
>> All archs we care about support them, though, so I think we can ignore
>> this issue for now.
> Kind of... In principle all QEMU-supported arches can use virtio, and
> the speedup can be quite useful. And there is no Kconfig symbol for SG
> chains that I can use to disable virtio-scsi on unsupported arches. :/
Well, we #error if it's not supported. Then the lazy architectures can
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/