Re: [PATCH] clk: remove unreachable code

[Rajagopal Venkat]

On 9 January 2013 11:20, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 06:33 PM, Rajagopal Venkat wrote:
>> while reparenting a clock, NULL check is done for clock in
>> consideration and its new parent. So re-check is not required.
>> If done, else part becomes unreachable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rajagopal Venkat <rajagopal.venkat@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/clk.c |    5 +----
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> index 251e45d..f896584 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> @@ -1048,10 +1048,7 @@ void __clk_reparent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *new_parent)
>>
>>       hlist_del(&clk->child_node);
>>
>> -     if (new_parent)
>> -             hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &new_parent->children);
>> -     else
>> -             hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &clk_orphan_list);
>> +     hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &new_parent->children);
>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG
>>       if (!inited)
>>
>
> The same logic holds good for following piece of code too.
>
> 1060 |-------if (new_parent)
> 1061 |-------|-------new_parent_d = new_parent->dentry;
> 1062 |-------else
> 1063 |-------|-------new_parent_d = orphandir;

Yes. Thanks for pointing out.

>
>
> --
> Tushar Behera



-- 
Regards,
Rajagopal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/