Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev()

From: Shawn Guo
Date: Thu Jan 10 2013 - 02:54:19 EST


On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:50:44PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> @Shawn: I believe your driver don't require that ugly code anymore (Though i
> know there is a situation for that to happen, if we have two cpus, you remove
> second one and then add it back. With this cpufreq_add_dev() would call init()
> first and then try to match if there are any managed_policies present. But the
> issue you pointed out about unregistering the driver would be solved by this
> patch.)

Yes, just played it and it works for me. However, I would have to keep
that little ugly code in my patch to save the dependency on your patch.
Will send a follow-up to clean that up once your patch hits mainline.

Shawn

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/