Re: [patch] dac960: return success instead of -ENOTTY

[Jens Axboe]

On 2013-01-11 07:52, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> There is a missing break statement here.  This used to return directly
> but we re-worked it in 2008 to add locking as part of the BKL push down.

Thanks Dan, applied. Must have a big user base...

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/