Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] cpufreq: handle SW coordinated CPUs

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, November 26, 2012 05:39:51 PM Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> Hello Rafael,
> 
> this patchset is a new version of the cpufreq SW coordinated CPU bug fix.
> That's basically the v4 rebased on linux-pm's linux-next tree, split in 5
> patches for readability and with the bug fixed also in the "conservative"
> governor.
> 
> Regards,
> Fabio
> 
> 
> Changes:
> v5
> - rebased/reimplemented on linux-next
> - split hotplug code on a separate patch
> - split ondemand/conservative specific fixes on separate patches
> v4
> - moved update_sampling rate code on separate patch
> - simplified dbs_sw_coordinated_cpus
> - reworked timer handling for code readability, now:
>   * do_dbs_timer() [-> dbs_timer_coordinated()] -> dbs_timer_update()
> - simplified cpu_callback cases
> v3
> - original submission
> 
> 
> Fabio Baltieri (4):
>   cpufreq: star/stop cpufreq timers on cpu hotplug
>   cpufreq: ondemand: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary
>   cpufreq: conservative: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary
>   cpufreq: ondemand: use all CPUs in update_sampling_rate
> 
> Rickard Andersson (1):
>   cpufreq: handle SW coordinated CPUs
> 
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c |  46 ++++++++++++--
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c     | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h     |   2 +
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c     |  62 +++++++++++++++----
>  4 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Applied to the linux-next branch of the linux-pm.git tree as v3.9 material.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/