Re: [PATCH v3 00/44] Meta Linux Kernel Port
From: James Hogan
Date: Sat Jan 12 2013 - 04:55:14 EST
Hi Stephen, Al,
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:09:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 +0000 James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch
> > of Al's signal tree (to get Vineet's GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK fix and
> > GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK's eventual removal).
>
> OK, but I hope you mentioned not rebasing to Al.
I'm still rebasing the metag tree, and it's not quite ready for -next so
I don't mind if Al's tree rebases at this stage tbh.
Al: I don't know if you normally rebase your tree, but if it's okay with
you I'll let you know when I need it not to be rebased.
> > git://github.com/jahogan/metag-linux.git
> > branch: metag-core
> > tag: metag-core-v3.1
>
> When you think it is sufficiently ready (and I am guessing that it is
> getting pretty close), please send me a request to add it to linux-next.
Thanks, will do.
Would "sufficiently ready" normally mean "in a state ready to send a
pull request to Linus"?
Thanks
James
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature