Re: your patch "x86, 8042: Enable A20 using KBC to fix S3 resume on some MSI laptops"

[Ondrej Zary]

On Monday 14 January 2013, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Ondrej,
>
> I see two problems with this patch: For one, on a system without
> i8042 the code at the place it got inserted ought to incur a stall of
> 1s (50us * I8042_CTL_TIMEOUT [10000] * 2). I believe that this
> code should not be run before i8042_controller_check() completed
> successfully, but at the very least the second call to
> i8042_command() should be conditional upon the first being
> successful (effectively halving the stall).

I believe that all PnP-capable systems without 8042 will exit with -ENODEV 
after x86_platform.i8042_detect(). Old non-PnP systems usually have 8042.

> Second, considering that enabling A20 (even if just in a fake way),
> is a core system operation, I don't think it belongs into a driver
> that is only optionally present in the kernel.

The first version of this patch added A20 enabling to early init code. But 
that could be dangerous as it was run before any 8042 detection, possibly 
breaking systems without 8042. I haven't found a better place for this.

-- 
Ondrej Zary
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/