Re: [PATCH v7u1 24/31] x86, boot: Not need to check setup_headerversion for setup_data

[Borislav Petkov]

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 09:37:36AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> No, this is a case of cargo-cult programming. I asked Yinghai to
> remove it.
>
> It is cargo-cult programming because the value of boot_params.hdr
> comes from the kernel itself, so all you're doing is telling you the
> boot protocol version associated with the kernel itself, which we
> already know.

LOOL. Great.

> If we find a bootloader that does that incorrectly (e.g. if kexec
> were to blindly copy struct boot_params from the older kernel...
> which ironically would be better than the current situation) then
> the right thing to do would be to have a central place which scrub
> out the fields and just force them to zero rather than putting a
> bunch of tests all over the place.

Ok, I didn't realize that.

And besides, nothing stops a silly boot loader from adjusting
boot_params.hdr.version so that the check - or any check for that matter
- passes, AFAICT.

See, this is exactly the reason why I'm trying to explain to Yinghai
why it is a Good Thing to document stuff like that at least in commit
messages.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/