Re: [PATCH] mips: function tracer: Fix broken function tracing

From: David Daney
Date: Tue Jan 15 2013 - 16:34:40 EST


On 01/15/2013 01:07 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 09:55 -0800, David Daney wrote:

There's nothing that states what the ftrace caller must be. We can have
it do a proper stack update. That is, only at boot up do we need to
handle the defined mcount. After that, those instructions are just place
holders for our own algorithms. If the addiu was needed for the defined
mcount, there's no reason to keep it for our own ftrace_caller.

Would that work?

... either do as you suggest and dynamically change the ABI of the
target function.

We already change the ABI. We have it call ftrace_caller instead of
mcount.

BTW, I've just compiled with gcc 4.6.3 against mips, and I don't see the
issue. I have:

0000000000000000 <account_kernel_stack>:
0: 03e0082d move at,ra
4: 0c000000 jal 0 <account_kernel_stack>
4: R_MIPS_26 _mcount
4: R_MIPS_NONE *ABS*
4: R_MIPS_NONE *ABS*
8: 0000602d move t0,zero
c: 2402000d li v0,13
10: 3c030000 lui v1,0x0
10: R_MIPS_HI16 mem_section
10: R_MIPS_NONE *ABS*
10: R_MIPS_NONE *ABS*
14: 000216fc dsll32 v0,v0,0x1b
18: 64630000 daddiu v1,v1,0

Is it dependent on the config?

Yes.

You need to select a 32-bit kernel (which in turn may require selecting a board type that also supports it).

The ABI is different for 32-bit and 64-bit _mcount.

David Daney




Or add support to GCC for a better tracing ABI (as I already said we did
for mips64).

I wouldn't waste time changing gcc for this. If you're going to change
gcc than please implement the -mfentry option. Look at x86_64 to
understand this more.

A good point. But I don't really plan on doing any work related to 32-bit mips things at this point, so any such change would have to be done by someone else.

David Daney

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/