Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] clk: tegra: Add tegra specific clocks

[Stephen Warren]

On 01/16/2013 05:31 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote @ Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:46:20 +0100:
> ...
>> +struct clk *tegra_clk_periph(const char *name, const char **parent_names,
>> +                            int num_parents, struct tegra_clk_periph *periph,
>> +                            void __iomem *clk_base, u32 offset)
...
>> +struct clk *tegra_clk_periph_nodiv(const char *name, const char **parent_names,
>> +                             int num_parents, struct tegra_clk_periph *periph,
>> +                             void __iomem *clk_base, u32 offset)
...
>
> The above two functions are almost duplicate, can we take the common part from them?

Sure, that looks reasonable.

> struct clk *__tegra_clk_periph(const char *name, const char **parent_names,
> 			    int num_parents, struct tegra_clk_periph *periph,
> 			    void __iomem *clk_base, u32 offset, int div)

>        periph->divider.reg = clk_base + offset;

That will also need to be conditional.

>        periph->divider.hw.clk = div ? NULL : clk;

And that test is inverted.

> static inline struct clk *tegra_clk_periph(const char *name, const char **parent_names,
> 			    int num_parents, struct tegra_clk_periph *periph,
> 			    void __iomem *clk_base, u32 offset)

I'd rather just make these regular functions in the .c file; otherwise
they have to go into the header file, which means prototyping
__tegra_clk_periph() there and it just gets messy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/