Re: LIO - the broken iSCSI target implementation

From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Date: Thu Jan 17 2013 - 20:54:00 EST



Andreas Steinmetz, on 01/16/2013 08:19 PM wrote:
Thus, lio (http://www.linux-iscsi.org/) seemed to be the politically and
technically favoured solution.

[...]

The fun part of it was that I finally ended up using SCST - which was
refrained from kernel inclusion for technical reasons beyond my
knowledge.

No, it was purely political. There has never been any technical argument why LIO is better. And can not be.

Thanks,
Vlad

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/