Re: Performance issue since 3.2.6

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, January 21, 2013 03:26:10 PM Olivier Doucet wrote:
> >> FYI, I benchmarked a new version with :
> >> CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME=y
> >> CONFIG_PM=y
> >>
> >> but the performance loss is still present.
> >
> > In that case it is not quite likely that the commit you bisected to
> > really introduced the problem, because it doesn't change things for
> > CONFIG_PM=y.
> >
> > Does reverting that commit still help?
> 
> I tested several combinations. Results follows :
> 3.2.6 (base) + CONFIG_PM unset  => BAD
> 3.2.6 (base) + CONFIG_PM=y  => BAD
> 3.2.6 (base) + patch reverted + CONFIG_PM=y  => BAD
> 3.2.6 (base) + patch reverted + CONFIG_PM unset  => GOOD

I see.  Two bugs, then.

> So if I understand right, the targeted patch introduced the bug when
> CONFIG_PM is unset, but there is an other bug when this var is set.
> I'll try to track this commit.

Thanks a lot!

Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/