Re: One of these things (CONFIG_HZ) is not like the others..

[Santosh Shilimkar]

On Tuesday 22 January 2013 04:53 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [130121 13:07]:
> > As for Samsung and the rest I can't comment.  The original reason OMAP
> > used this though was because the 32768Hz counter can't produce 100Hz
> > without a .1% error - too much error under pre-clocksource
> > implementations for timekeeping.  Whether that's changed with the
> > clocksource/clockevent support needs to be checked.
>
> Yes that's why HZ was originally set to 128. That value (or some multiple)
> still makes sense when the 32 KiHZ clock source is being used. Of course
> we should rely on the local timer when running for the SoCs that have
> them.
This is right. It was only because of the drift associated when clocked
with 32KHz. Even on SOCs where local timers are available for power
management reasons we need to switch to 32KHz clocked device in
low power states. Hence the HZ value should be multiple of 32 on
OMAP.

Regards
Santosh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/