[ 30/46] usb: musb: cppi_dma: drop __init annotation

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Thu Jan 24 2013 - 16:15:31 EST


3.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 091a62c9b3d899d99dbf4e3dbebc8dfa3edbccdd upstream.

This patch fixes the following:

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1e709c): Section mismatch in reference from the funct
ion dma_controller_create() to the function .init.text:cppi_controller_start()
The function dma_controller_create() references
the function __init cppi_controller_start().
This is often because dma_controller_create lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of cppi_controller_start is wrong.

This warning is there due to the deficiency in the commit 07a67bbb (usb: musb:
Make dma_controller_create __devinit).

Since the start() method is only called from musb_init_controller() which is
not annotated, drop '__init' annotation from cppi_controller_start() and also
cppi_pool_init() since it gets called from that function, to avoid another
section mismatch warning...

Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
drivers/usb/musb/cppi_dma.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/usb/musb/cppi_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/cppi_dma.c
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static void cppi_reset_tx(struct cppi_tx
musb_writel(&tx->tx_complete, 0, ptr);
}

-static void __init cppi_pool_init(struct cppi *cppi, struct cppi_channel *c)
+static void cppi_pool_init(struct cppi *cppi, struct cppi_channel *c)
{
int j;

@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static void cppi_pool_free(struct cppi_c
c->last_processed = NULL;
}

-static int __init cppi_controller_start(struct dma_controller *c)
+static int cppi_controller_start(struct dma_controller *c)
{
struct cppi *controller;
void __iomem *tibase;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/