Re: [PATCH -v4 4/5] x86,smp: keep spinlock delay values per hashedspinlock address

From: Michel Lespinasse
Date: Sun Jan 27 2013 - 08:04:25 EST


On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> + u32 delay = (ent->hash == hash) ? ent->delay : MIN_SPINLOCK_DELAY;

I still don't like the reseting of delay to MIN_SPINLOCK_DELAY when
there is a hash collision.

--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/