Re: [patch v4 0/18] sched: simplified fork, release load avg andpower awareness scheduling

[Alex Shi]

On 01/28/2013 11:55 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 16:22 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: 
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:40:46PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>>>> No no, that's not restricted to one node.  It's just overloaded because
>>>> I turned balancing off at the NODE domain level.
>>>
>>> Which shows only that I was multitasking, and in a rush.  Boy was that
>>> dumb.  Hohum.
>>
>> Ok, let's take a step back and slow it down a bit so that people like me
>> can understand it: you want to try it with disabled load balancing on
>> the node level, AFAICT. But with that many tasks, perf will suck anyway,
>> no? Unless you want to benchmark the numa-aware aspect and see whether
>> load balancing on the node level feels differently, perf-wise?
> 
> The broken thought was, since it's not wakeup path, stop node balance..
> but killing all of it killed FORK/EXEC balance, oops.

Um. sure. so guess all of tasks just running on one node.
> 
> I think I'm done with this thing though.  See mail I just sent.   There
> are better things to do than letting box jerk my chain endlessly ;-)
> 
> -Mike
> 


-- 
Thanks Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/