[PATCH] block: fix ext_devt_idr handling

From: Tomas Henzl
Date: Tue Jan 29 2013 - 09:20:52 EST


While adding and removing a lot of disks disks and partitions this sometimes
shows up -
WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:512 sysfs_add_one+0xc9/0x130() (Not tainted)
Hardware name:
sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/dev/block/259:751'
Modules linked in: raid1 autofs4 bnx2fc cnic uio fcoe libfcoe libfc 8021q scsi_transport_fc scsi_tgt garp stp llc sunrpc cpufreq_ondemand powernow_k8 freq_table mperf ipv6 dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log power_meter microcode dcdbas serio_raw amd64_edac_mod edac_core edac_mce_amd i2c_piix4 i2c_core k10temp bnx2 sg ixgbe dca mdio ext4 mbcache jbd2 dm_round_robin sr_mod cdrom sd_mod crc_t10dif ata_generic pata_acpi pata_atiixp ahci mptsas mptscsih mptbase scsi_transport_sas dm_multipath dm_mod [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
Pid: 44103, comm: async/16 Not tainted 2.6.32-195.el6.x86_64 #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81069b17>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x87/0xc0
[<ffffffff81069c06>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
[<ffffffff811ecf09>] ? sysfs_add_one+0xc9/0x130
[<ffffffff811ed3eb>] ? sysfs_do_create_link+0x12b/0x170
[<ffffffff811ed463>] ? sysfs_create_link+0x13/0x20
[<ffffffff81343177>] ? device_add+0x317/0x650
[<ffffffff8126bd03>] ? idr_get_new+0x13/0x50
[<ffffffff811e6adc>] ? add_partition+0x21c/0x390
[<ffffffff811e759b>] ? rescan_partitions+0x32b/0x470
[<ffffffffa008e341>] ? sd_open+0x81/0x1f0 [sd_mod]
[<ffffffff811afa56>] ? __blkdev_get+0x1b6/0x3c0
[<ffffffff811afc70>] ? blkdev_get+0x10/0x20
[<ffffffff811e68a5>] ? register_disk+0x155/0x170
[<ffffffff81258706>] ? add_disk+0xa6/0x160
[<ffffffffa00919db>] ? sd_probe_async+0x13b/0x210 [sd_mod]
[<ffffffff81090ed6>] ? add_wait_queue+0x46/0x60
[<ffffffff81098dd2>] ? async_thread+0x102/0x250
[<ffffffff8105f740>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
[<ffffffff81098cd0>] ? async_thread+0x0/0x250
[<ffffffff81090806>] ? kthread+0x96/0xa0
[<ffffffff8100c10a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
[<ffffffff81090770>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
[<ffffffff8100c100>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
This most likely happens because dev_t is freed before while the number is still used
and idr_get_new is not protected on every use. The fix adds a mutex where
it wasn't before and moves the dev_t free function so it is called after
device del.

Signed-off-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/genhd.c | 6 +++++-
block/partition-generic.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index 9cf5583..9433636 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -420,14 +420,18 @@ int blk_alloc_devt(struct hd_struct *part, dev_t *devt)
do {
if (!idr_pre_get(&ext_devt_idr, GFP_KERNEL))
return -ENOMEM;
+ mutex_lock(&ext_devt_mutex);
rc = idr_get_new(&ext_devt_idr, part, &idx);
+ mutex_unlock(&ext_devt_mutex);
} while (rc == -EAGAIN);

if (rc)
return rc;

if (idx > MAX_EXT_DEVT) {
+ mutex_lock(&ext_devt_mutex);
idr_remove(&ext_devt_idr, idx);
+ mutex_unlock(&ext_devt_mutex);
return -EBUSY;
}

@@ -644,7 +648,6 @@ void del_gendisk(struct gendisk *disk)
disk_part_iter_exit(&piter);

invalidate_partition(disk, 0);
- blk_free_devt(disk_to_dev(disk)->devt);
set_capacity(disk, 0);
disk->flags &= ~GENHD_FL_UP;

@@ -662,6 +665,7 @@ void del_gendisk(struct gendisk *disk)
if (!sysfs_deprecated)
sysfs_remove_link(block_depr, dev_name(disk_to_dev(disk)));
device_del(disk_to_dev(disk));
+ blk_free_devt(disk_to_dev(disk)->devt);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(del_gendisk);

diff --git a/block/partition-generic.c b/block/partition-generic.c
index 6df5d69..7b8b8d1 100644
--- a/block/partition-generic.c
+++ b/block/partition-generic.c
@@ -249,11 +249,11 @@ void delete_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int partno)
if (!part)
return;

- blk_free_devt(part_devt(part));
rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->part[partno], NULL);
rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, NULL);
kobject_put(part->holder_dir);
device_del(part_to_dev(part));
+ blk_free_devt(part_devt(part));

hd_struct_put(part);
}
--
1.7.11.7


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/