Re: Failure due to missing (Exynos related) pinctrl patch

[Sachin Kamat]

On 30 January 2013 09:38, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>
>> >> This patch is required along with the
>> >> patch "gpio: samsung: fix pinctrl condition for exynos and exynos5440"
>> >> (mainline commit Id: e4a5da51) which has already made it into
>> >> mainline. Without the missing patch we get the following boot up
>> >> warnings and subsequent failures with dt boot on 4412 based board:
>> >
>> > Hm I didn't realize there was a dependency between these
>> > patches, oh well, better get the pull for the pinctrl tree finished
>> > off then...
>>
>> Ideally those 2 patches should have been squashed together.
>>
> Err, Sachin, what are you talking about? As you said, one patch has been
> merged into the mainline, so how does it can be squashed? In this case, just
> applying the other patch into pinctrl-fixes is enough.

Yes you are right. It cannot be squashed now. I was referring to the
time of generation of these patches.

>
> Thanks.
>
> - Kukjin
>



-- 
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/