Re: [PATCH 1/4] firmware: Refactoring for splitting user-mode helper code

From: Takashi Iwai
Date: Wed Jan 30 2013 - 02:17:36 EST


At Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:37:30 +0800,
Ming Lei wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Since 3.7 kernel, the firmware loader can read the firmware files
> > directly, and the traditional user-mode helper is invoked only as a
> > fallback. This seems working pretty well, and the next step would be
> > to reduce the redundant user-mode helper stuff in future.
> >
> > This patch is a preparation for that: refactor the code for splitting
> > user-mode helper stuff more easily. No functional change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 290 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > 1 file changed, 157 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > index b392b35..27f2c7c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > @@ -319,7 +319,8 @@ static bool fw_read_file_contents(struct file *file, struct firmware_buf *fw_buf
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > -static bool fw_get_filesystem_firmware(struct firmware_buf *buf)
> > +static bool fw_get_filesystem_firmware(struct device *device,
> > + struct firmware_buf *buf)
> > {
> > int i;
> > bool success = false;
> > @@ -343,6 +344,16 @@ static bool fw_get_filesystem_firmware(struct firmware_buf *buf)
> > break;
> > }
> > __putname(path);
> > +
> > + if (success) {
> > + dev_dbg(device, "firmware: direct-loading firmware %s\n",
> > + buf->fw_id);
> > + mutex_lock(&fw_lock);
> > + set_bit(FW_STATUS_DONE, &buf->status);
> > + complete_all(&buf->completion);
> > + mutex_unlock(&fw_lock);
> > + }
> > +
> > return success;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -796,99 +807,112 @@ static int fw_add_devm_name(struct device *dev, const char *name)
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > -static void _request_firmware_cleanup(const struct firmware **firmware_p)
> > +/* wait until the shared firmware_buf becomes ready (or error) */
> > +static int sync_cached_firmware_buf(struct firmware_buf *buf)
> > {
> > - release_firmware(*firmware_p);
> > - *firmware_p = NULL;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&fw_lock);
> > + while (!test_bit(FW_STATUS_DONE, &buf->status)) {
> > + if (test_bit(FW_STATUS_ABORT, &buf->status)) {
> > + ret = -ENOENT;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + mutex_unlock(&fw_lock);
> > + wait_for_completion(&buf->completion);
> > + mutex_lock(&fw_lock);
> > + }
> > + mutex_unlock(&fw_lock);
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -static struct firmware_priv *
> > -_request_firmware_prepare(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
> > - struct device *device, bool uevent, bool nowait)
> > +/* prepare firmware and firmware_buf structs;
> > + * return 0 if a firmware is already assigned, 1 if need to load one,
> > + * or a negative error code
> > + */
> > +static int
> > +_request_firmware_prepare(struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
> > + struct device *device)
> > {
> > struct firmware *firmware;
> > - struct firmware_priv *fw_priv = NULL;
> > struct firmware_buf *buf;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - if (!firmware_p)
> > - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > -
> > *firmware_p = firmware = kzalloc(sizeof(*firmware), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!firmware) {
> > dev_err(device, "%s: kmalloc(struct firmware) failed\n",
> > __func__);
> > - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > }
> >
> > if (fw_get_builtin_firmware(firmware, name)) {
> > dev_dbg(device, "firmware: using built-in firmware %s\n", name);
> > - return NULL;
> > + return 0; /* assigned */
> > }
> >
> > ret = fw_lookup_and_allocate_buf(name, &fw_cache, &buf);
> > - if (!ret)
> > - fw_priv = fw_create_instance(firmware, name, device,
> > - uevent, nowait);
> >
> > - if (IS_ERR(fw_priv) || ret < 0) {
> > - kfree(firmware);
> > - *firmware_p = NULL;
> > - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > - } else if (fw_priv) {
> > - fw_priv->buf = buf;
> > + /*
> > + * bind with 'buf' now to avoid warning in failure path
> > + * of requesting firmware.
> > + */
> > + firmware->priv = buf;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * bind with 'buf' now to avoid warning in failure path
> > - * of requesting firmware.
> > - */
> > - firmware->priv = buf;
> > - return fw_priv;
> > + if (ret > 0) {
> > + ret = sync_cached_firmware_buf(buf);
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + fw_set_page_data(buf, firmware);
> > + return 0; /* assigned */
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > - /* share the cached buf, which is inprogessing or completed */
> > - check_status:
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + return 1; /* need to load */
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int assign_firmware_buf(struct firmware *fw, struct device *device)
> > +{
> > + struct firmware_buf *buf = fw->priv;
> > +
> > mutex_lock(&fw_lock);
> > - if (test_bit(FW_STATUS_ABORT, &buf->status)) {
> > - fw_priv = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> > - firmware->priv = buf;
> > - _request_firmware_cleanup(firmware_p);
> > - goto exit;
> > - } else if (test_bit(FW_STATUS_DONE, &buf->status)) {
> > - fw_priv = NULL;
> > - fw_set_page_data(buf, firmware);
> > - goto exit;
> > + if (!buf->size || test_bit(FW_STATUS_ABORT, &buf->status)) {
> > + mutex_unlock(&fw_lock);
> > + return -ENOENT;
> > }
> > - mutex_unlock(&fw_lock);
> > - wait_for_completion(&buf->completion);
> > - goto check_status;
> >
> > -exit:
> > + /*
> > + * add firmware name into devres list so that we can auto cache
> > + * and uncache firmware for device.
> > + *
> > + * device may has been deleted already, but the problem
> > + * should be fixed in devres or driver core.
> > + */
> > + if (device)
> > + fw_add_devm_name(device, buf->fw_id);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * After caching firmware image is started, let it piggyback
> > + * on request firmware.
> > + */
> > + if (buf->fwc->state == FW_LOADER_START_CACHE) {
> > + if (fw_cache_piggyback_on_request(buf->fw_id))
> > + kref_get(&buf->ref);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* pass the pages buffer to driver at the last minute */
> > + fw_set_page_data(buf, fw);
> > mutex_unlock(&fw_lock);
> > - return fw_priv;
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +/* load a firmware via user helper */
> > static int _request_firmware_load(struct firmware_priv *fw_priv, bool uevent,
> > long timeout)
> > {
> > int retval = 0;
> > struct device *f_dev = &fw_priv->dev;
> > struct firmware_buf *buf = fw_priv->buf;
> > - struct firmware_cache *fwc = &fw_cache;
> > - int direct_load = 0;
> > -
> > - /* try direct loading from fs first */
> > - if (fw_get_filesystem_firmware(buf)) {
> > - dev_dbg(f_dev->parent, "firmware: direct-loading"
> > - " firmware %s\n", buf->fw_id);
> > -
> > - mutex_lock(&fw_lock);
> > - set_bit(FW_STATUS_DONE, &buf->status);
> > - mutex_unlock(&fw_lock);
> > - complete_all(&buf->completion);
> > - direct_load = 1;
> > - goto handle_fw;
> > - }
> >
> > /* fall back on userspace loading */
> > buf->fmt = PAGE_BUF;
> > @@ -929,38 +953,7 @@ static int _request_firmware_load(struct firmware_priv *fw_priv, bool uevent,
> >
> > cancel_delayed_work_sync(&fw_priv->timeout_work);
> >
> > -handle_fw:
> > - mutex_lock(&fw_lock);
> > - if (!buf->size || test_bit(FW_STATUS_ABORT, &buf->status))
> > - retval = -ENOENT;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * add firmware name into devres list so that we can auto cache
> > - * and uncache firmware for device.
> > - *
> > - * f_dev->parent may has been deleted already, but the problem
> > - * should be fixed in devres or driver core.
> > - */
> > - if (!retval && f_dev->parent)
> > - fw_add_devm_name(f_dev->parent, buf->fw_id);
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * After caching firmware image is started, let it piggyback
> > - * on request firmware.
> > - */
> > - if (!retval && fwc->state == FW_LOADER_START_CACHE) {
> > - if (fw_cache_piggyback_on_request(buf->fw_id))
> > - kref_get(&buf->ref);
> > - }
> > -
> > - /* pass the pages buffer to driver at the last minute */
> > - fw_set_page_data(buf, fw_priv->fw);
> > -
> > fw_priv->buf = NULL;
> > - mutex_unlock(&fw_lock);
> > -
> > - if (direct_load)
> > - goto err_put_dev;
> >
> > device_remove_file(f_dev, &dev_attr_loading);
> > err_del_bin_attr:
> > @@ -972,6 +965,77 @@ err_put_dev:
> > return retval;
> > }
> >
> > +static int fw_load_from_user_helper(struct firmware *firmware,
> > + const char *name, struct device *device,
> > + bool uevent, bool nowait)
> > +{
> > + struct firmware_priv *fw_priv;
> > + long timeout;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + fw_priv = fw_create_instance(firmware, name, device, uevent, nowait);
> > + if (IS_ERR(fw_priv))
> > + return PTR_ERR(fw_priv);
> > +
> > + fw_priv->buf = firmware->priv;
> > +
> > + timeout = firmware_loading_timeout();
> > + if (nowait) {
> > + timeout = usermodehelper_read_lock_wait(timeout);
> > + if (!timeout) {
> > + dev_dbg(device, "firmware: %s loading timed out\n",
> > + name);
> > + kfree(fw_priv);
> > + return -EAGAIN;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + ret = usermodehelper_read_trylock();
> > + if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
> > + dev_err(device, "firmware: %s will not be loaded\n",
> > + name);
> > + kfree(fw_priv);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> The above usermodehelper_read_lock thing may be a functional change,
> and looks not what you claimed in commit log, :-). The lock is currently held in
> direct loading case, but your patch change the rule. Without holding the lock,
> request_firmware() may touch filesystem / storage too early during
> kernel boot or system resume in direct loading case.

Does it really happen in a real scenario?

If so, using usermode helper lock for that purpose sounds like an
abuse to be fixed differently or replaced with a better one.


> > +
> > + ret = _request_firmware_load(fw_priv, uevent, timeout);
> > + usermodehelper_read_unlock();
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* called from request_firmware() and request_firmware_work_func() */
> > +static int
> > +_request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
> > + struct device *device, bool uevent, bool nowait)
> > +{
> > + struct firmware *fw;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!firmware_p)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + ret = _request_firmware_prepare(&fw, name, device);
> > + if (ret <= 0) /* error or already assigned */
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + ret = 0;
> > + if (!fw_get_filesystem_firmware(device, fw->priv))
> > + ret = fw_load_from_user_helper(fw, name, device,
> > + uevent, nowait);
> > +
> > + if (!ret)
> > + ret = assign_firmware_buf(fw, device);
> > +
> > + out:
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + release_firmware(fw);
> > + fw = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + *firmware_p = fw;
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * request_firmware: - send firmware request and wait for it
> > * @firmware_p: pointer to firmware image
> > @@ -996,26 +1060,7 @@ int
> > request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
> > struct device *device)
> > {
> > - struct firmware_priv *fw_priv;
> > - int ret;
> > -
> > - fw_priv = _request_firmware_prepare(firmware_p, name, device, true,
> > - false);
> > - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fw_priv))
> > - return PTR_RET(fw_priv);
> > -
> > - ret = usermodehelper_read_trylock();
> > - if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
> > - dev_err(device, "firmware: %s will not be loaded\n", name);
> > - } else {
> > - ret = _request_firmware_load(fw_priv, true,
> > - firmware_loading_timeout());
> > - usermodehelper_read_unlock();
> > - }
> > - if (ret)
> > - _request_firmware_cleanup(firmware_p);
> > -
> > - return ret;
> > + return _request_firmware(firmware_p, name, device, true, false);
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -1046,33 +1091,12 @@ static void request_firmware_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> > {
> > struct firmware_work *fw_work;
> > const struct firmware *fw;
> > - struct firmware_priv *fw_priv;
> > - long timeout;
> > - int ret;
> >
> > fw_work = container_of(work, struct firmware_work, work);
> > - fw_priv = _request_firmware_prepare(&fw, fw_work->name, fw_work->device,
> > - fw_work->uevent, true);
> > - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fw_priv)) {
> > - ret = PTR_RET(fw_priv);
> > - goto out;
> > - }
> >
> > - timeout = usermodehelper_read_lock_wait(firmware_loading_timeout());
> > - if (timeout) {
> > - ret = _request_firmware_load(fw_priv, fw_work->uevent, timeout);
> > - usermodehelper_read_unlock();
> > - } else {
> > - dev_dbg(fw_work->device, "firmware: %s loading timed out\n",
> > - fw_work->name);
> > - ret = -EAGAIN;
> > - }
> > - if (ret)
> > - _request_firmware_cleanup(&fw);
> > -
> > - out:
> > + _request_firmware(&fw, fw_work->name, fw_work->device,
> > + fw_work->uevent, true);
> > fw_work->cont(fw, fw_work->context);
> > - put_device(fw_work->device);
>
> The above put_device is the pair of get_device inside request_firmware_nowait(),
> I am wondering why you think it is not balanced, and to be removed . Did you
> observe a double free?

Oh yeah, I completely misread the code. It should remain there.



Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/