Re: Failure due to missing (Exynos related) pinctrl patch

[Sachin Kamat]

Hi Linus,

On 30 January 2013 15:18, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>>
>>> >> This patch is required along with the
>>> >> patch "gpio: samsung: fix pinctrl condition for exynos and exynos5440"
>>> >> (mainline commit Id: e4a5da51) which has already made it into
>>> >> mainline. Without the missing patch we get the following boot up
>>> >> warnings and subsequent failures with dt boot on 4412 based board:
>>> >
>>> > Hm I didn't realize there was a dependency between these
>>> > patches, oh well, better get the pull for the pinctrl tree finished
>>> > off then...

>
> Torvalds has already pulled it in -> problem solved. :-)
>

I tested this on Linus T.'s latest tip (2e51b231) and the problem
still persists :(

You sent the following patch in your pull request to Linus T.:
Kukjin Kim (1):
      pinctrl: samsung: removing duplicated condition for PINCTRL_SAMSUNG

However, the missing dependent patch is:

"pinctrl: exynos: change PINCTRL_EXYNOS option"

-- 
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/