Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: governors: Remove code redundancy betweengovernors

[Fabio Baltieri]

Hello Rafael,

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:23:54PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, January 31, 2013 07:50:04 PM Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:58:02PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > With the inclusion of following patches:
> > > 
> > > 9f4eb10 cpufreq: conservative: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary
> > > 772b4b1 cpufreq: ondemand: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary
> > > 
> > > code redundancy is introduced again. Get rid of it.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> OK
> 
> Fabio, Viresh, Shawn,
> 
> This time I was *really* confused as to what patches I was supposed to take,
> from whom and in what order, so I applied a number of them in the order given
> by patchwork.  That worked well enough, because (almost) all of them applied
> for me without conflicts.  That said I would appreciate it if you could look
> into the bleeding-edge branch of my tree and see if there's anything missing
> or something that shouldn't be there (cpufreq-wise).

Sorry for the confusion, your current bleeding-edge branch (eed52da)
looks good to me.  I also did a quick build and run and it works fine on
my setup.

Many thanks,
Fabio

-- 
Fabio Baltieri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/