Re: [PATCH 22/25] perf: Make EVENT_ATTR global

[Ingo Molnar]

* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Rename EVENT_ATTR() to PMU_EVENT_ATTR() and make it global so it is
> available to all architectures.
> 
> Further to allow architectures flexibility, have PMU_EVENT_ATTR() pass
> in the variable name as a parameter.
> 
> Changelog[v2]
> 	- [Jiri Olsa] No need to define PMU_EVENT_PTR()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130123062422.GC13720@xxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 13 +++----------
>  include/linux/perf_event.h       | 11 +++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

so this one started conflicting non-trivially with tip:perf/x86 
- the pending memory profiling kernel-side bits.

Can we merge the memory profiling tooling side bits together 
with the kernel side bits - or does it need more work?

For now I've excluded perf/x86 from tip:master until this is 
resolved.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/