Re: [PATCH] firewire: Fix ohci free_irq() warning

[Mark Einon]

On 31 January 2013 15:04, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Mark Einon wrote:
>
>> >> > >> This patch fixes the kernel warning generated when putting an MSI MS-1727
>> >> > >> GT740 laptop into suspend mode. The call sequence in this case calls
>> >> > >> free_irq() twice, once in pci_remove() and once then in pci_suspend().
>> >> > >
>> >> > > You mean /first/ in pci_suspend() and /then/ in pci_remove() on the
>> >> > > already suspended devices, right?
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes, I did. The call sequence is suspend then resume. My bad.
>> >
>> > Why does the pci_suspend routine call free_irq() at all?  As far as I
>> > know, it's not supposed to do that.  Won't the device continue to use
>> > the same IRQ after it is resumed?
>>
>> This sounds reasonable to me - I think we could probably get rid of
>> the request_irq() call from resume, and use
>> disable_irq()/enable_irq()?
>
> Why mess around with IRQ settings at all?  Just have the suspend
> routine tell the controller to stop generating them.
>
> Alan Stern
>

I looked into doing this; using context_stop() to stop the controller running.

However, removing the enable_irq() from pci_resume() involves not
calling ohci_enable() (as it is also the fw_card_driver.enable
function, and can't easily be modified). As this call involves a lot
of register writes and I have no devices to test, I decided against
it.

I'll send an updated patch for consideration that merely uses a bool
to stop the irq being freed twice - crude, but it works without
changing too much code.

Cheers,

Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/