Re: [PATCH] [Watchdog][Trivial] Added comments to explainwatchdog_disabled variable

[anish kumar]

On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 09:59 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 07:19:07PM +0530, anish kumar wrote:
> > From: anish kumar <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This watchdog_disabled flag is bit of cryptic.Howerver it's usefullnes is multifold.
> > Uses are:
> > 1. Check if smpboot_register_percpu_thread function passed.
> > 2. Makes sure that user enables and disables the watchdog in sequence
> >    i.e. enable watchdog->disable watchdog->enable watchdog
> >    Unlike enable watchdog->enable watchdog which is wrong.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: anish kumar <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  kernel/watchdog.c |    5 +++++
> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
> > index 6ef638b..dfd843a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> > +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> > @@ -519,6 +519,11 @@ int proc_dowatchdog(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> >  	set_sample_period();
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We shouldn't enable watchdog threads if it is not
> 							^^^
> the 'not' is not needed I believe.  Other than that, if it helps
> to understand the code better.  I am fine with it.
> 
> Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Should I wait for some more acked-by's?
> 
> > +	 * disabled.This is done by watchdog_disabled
> > +	 * variable check in watchdog_*_all_cpus function.
> > +	 */
> >  	if (watchdog_enabled && watchdog_thresh)
> >  		watchdog_enable_all_cpus();
> >  	else
> > -- 
> > 1.7.1
> > 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/