[ 033/128] tcm_fc: Do not indicate retry capability to initiators

From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Sun Feb 03 2013 - 10:19:45 EST


3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@xxxxxxxxx>

commit f2eeba214bcd0215b7f558cab6420e5fd153042b upstream.

When generating a PRLI response to an initiator, clear the
FCP_SPPF_RETRY bit in the response.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi <bprakash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked by Robert Love <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_sess.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_sess.c b/drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_sess.c
index 12d6fa2..59f2b46 100644
--- a/drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_sess.c
+++ b/drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_sess.c
@@ -396,10 +396,10 @@ static int ft_prli_locked(struct fc_rport_priv *rdata, u32 spp_len,

/*
* OR in our service parameters with other provider (initiator), if any.
- * TBD XXX - indicate RETRY capability?
*/
fill:
fcp_parm = ntohl(spp->spp_params);
+ fcp_parm &= ~FCP_SPPF_RETRY;
spp->spp_params = htonl(fcp_parm | FCP_SPPF_TARG_FCN);
return FC_SPP_RESP_ACK;
}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/