Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors

[Viresh Kumar]

On 5 February 2013 18:52, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 05:54:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:q
>> This indication isn't enough. On a single image solution, we need to
>> identify the system which needs support for multiple policies and i
>> still feel we need that variable type indication :)
>
> If the image is going to run also on systems which support only a
> single policy, then I guess you can make it a bool, stuff it in struct
> cpufreq_policy and ifdef around it.

That's what i proposed initially.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/