Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: SoC name and revision unification

From: Ruslan Bilovol
Date: Wed Feb 06 2013 - 10:11:49 EST


On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@xxxxxx> [130131 11:28]:
>> This is a long story where for each new generation of
>> OMAP we used different approaches for creating
>> strings for SoCs names and revisions that this patch
>> fixes. It makes future exporting of this information
>> to SoC infrastructure easier.
>
> Maybe use name soc_name and soc_rev instead and make
Yes agree, will change in next patchset

> cpu_name and cpu_rev local to the functions?
> That would reduce some churn here.
This is used in second patch in this series

>
> Also this does not apply to my omap-for-v3.9/soc
> branch. Care to update this (and possibly the second one)
> against that?
Yes, I will rebase the patches on top of this branch.

>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/