Re: [PATCH 3/5] cpufreq: Do not track governor name for scalingdrivers with internal governors.

[Viresh Kumar]

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:32 PM,  <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Scaling drivers that implement internal governors do not have governor
> structures assocaited with them.  Only track the name of the governor
> associated with the CPU if the driver does not implement
> cpufreq_driver.setpolicy()
>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |    4 +++-
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 0ba0344..e772053 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1049,7 +1049,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif
>                 __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> -       strncpy(per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_governor, cpu), data->governor->name,
> +       if (!cpufreq_driver->setpolicy)
> +               strncpy(per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_governor, cpu),
> +                       data->governor->name,
>                         CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);

While applying this patch in my repo, i have merged above two lines into a
single line.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/