Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add P state driver for Intel Core Processors

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 08:38:04 AM Dirk Brandewie wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> On 02/12/2013 01:49 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 09:02:07AM -0800, dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > Won't you also need to patch drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c to not load
> > on the processors that you want this driver to run on ?
> >
> > 	Dave
> >
> 
> For the case where both are built-in the load order works my driver uses
> device_initcall() and acpi_cpufreq uses late_initcall().
> 
> For the case where both are a module (which I was sure I tested) you are right
> I will have to do something.
> 
> For now I propose to make my driver built-in only while I sort out the right
> solution for the module build.  Does this seem reasonable to everyone?

Well, I've been saying I think your driver should be non-modular from the
start. :-)

May I ask for a kernel command line switch to prevent it from registering if
the user doesn't actually want it, though, if it's going to be non-modular?

Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/