Re: [PATCH] dw_dmac: adjust slave_id accordingly to request line base

[Mika Westerberg]

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:27:38PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> Not in the CSRT parser. Once your plaform devices are created, you can add your
> own board handler for each platform device. This board code, using the
> data availble from CSRT can go ahead and do the translation and present the
> actual addresses to dmac.
> Would this be doable with ACPI5.

I'm not sure what you mean by own board handler?

AFAIK, the only platform specific code is under arch/x86/platform/* but we
don't have such thing for Lynxpoint and it should not be needed as we can
enumerate the devices from ACPI.

> Somehow I dont like the idea of DMA resource for request lines. DMA
> resources have specific meaning, perhpas IO resource maybe better idea.

Well, it's a DMA request line so we thought that IORESOURCE_DMA would suit
fine there and the drivers that use these are well aware of their usage.
Not sure about IORESOURCE_IO, it has also specific meaning and I don't
think DMA request lines fit there either :-(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/